<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Blog on ZachFi</title>
    <link>https://zach.fi/tags/blog/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Blog on ZachFi</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.148.2</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 14:01:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://zach.fi/tags/blog/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Hugo</title>
      <link>https://zach.fi/posts/hugo/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 14:01:52 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://zach.fi/posts/hugo/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For the last few months I&amp;rsquo;ve been learning the Go programming language while
working on various work related projects, and as I do, I reflect on the older
tools and patterns that I&amp;rsquo;ve used and developed over the years and wonder if
there is a better approach.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Each time I pick up a new language, every few years, I start this evaluation
process. In this case, a friend from work pointed out a new static website
generation tool. It turns out, I&amp;rsquo;ve been neglecting a couple static sites that
could use some updating!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A New Start</title>
      <link>https://zach.fi/2014/05/23/starting-again/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 23:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://zach.fi/2014/05/23/starting-again/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It struck me the other day, that this is probably as good a year as any to try
again at keeping a website online. There have been others before this, but
like a moth to the flame, I ended up spending more time hacking on the site
than I did writing entries, completely defeating the initial intention. As
such, I thought I would give &lt;a href=&#34;http://jekyllrb.com&#34;&gt;Jekyll&lt;/a&gt; a try. Looks simple, well
documented, customizable and looks to have a pretty strong community. All
good signs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
